ABG All Board Games
Turning The Tables box art

Turning The Tables

Players

1-2

Time

?-?

Age

?+

Weight

2.58

Rating

7.02

Fit

Teach 2.4

Teaching signal

Replay 4.0

High replayability

Interaction 3.8

Highly interactive

Scaling 4.0

Scales well

Strategy 4.5

Deep strategy

Control 3.3

Luck-sensitive

Table feel

The game Turning the Tables has a high level of direct confrontation and strategic depth in confrontation. Players must frequently pay attention to and react to each other's strategies and turns. However, there is a lower emphasis on cooperation in this game. Overall, the game has a strong interaction score of 7.5.

Replay value

Turning the Tables has a high replayability score due to its high variability gameboard, impactful expansions, deep strategic possibilities, and good scalability. The game offers fresh experiences each time it is played, allowing players to discover new tactics and strategies. The presence of expansions adds new content and gameplay elements, further enhancing the replay value. The game adapts well to different player counts without compromising its appeal or balance. Although it may take some time to learn, the depth it offers makes it worth the effort.

Luck profile

The final luck score for Turning the Tables is 6.67 out of 10. This indicates a balanced mix of luck and strategy in the game. Random elements have a notable but not exclusive impact on the game outcome, and players have substantial ability to mitigate randomness through strategic decisions and planning. The game outcome is primarily determined by player strategy and decisions, with luck playing a minor role.

Overview

Folio format, operational level treatment of the launch and subsequent defeat of the Soviet Spring 1942 offensive. First installment in Moments in History's "T3" series, which has subsequently become the "Schwerpunkt" series for GMT Games. Hallmarks of the system are ease of play and the "fog of war" element. Contrary to the playing time above this game takes about 6 hours to play unless their is an earlier sudden death decision. Features C3I points used to generate the number of units that can be activated to move and the number of attacks that can be made during each segment. There are three segments per turn in which each player must begin by deciding whether they will move and then attack or attack and then move. Not only is combat strength compared but also a unit's tactical rating when resolving combats. The side with the higher tactical rating gets to draw more random chits most of which have beneficial drms for that side. To a limited extent combat losses can be converted into retreats and enemy retreats can occasionally result in an additional advance for the attacker. Occasionally, extreme die rolls allow additional spontaneous activities. ZoCs are hard except friendly units allow tracing supply through them. Loss of supply reduces unit effectiveness and can result in attrition. Victory is determined mostly by units losses but also the Soviet control of objective cities and the presence of even one friendly unit on the other players side of the Donets river provides a healthy number of VPs. Both players begin with units in this position and so cancel each other out. All in all it is a tense game. The Russian player with the benefit of hindsight can avoid many of the hazards of the original campaign by not over extending himself. Republished in Command Magazine Japan #56.

Editions

Edition Year Language Publisher / Region
No editions imported yet.

Files

No files imported yet.

Commerce

No commerce mappings imported yet.

Credits

Designers

1
Dirk Blennemann

Artists

1
Sawshun Yamagushi

Publishers

2
Kokusai-Tsushin Co., Ltd. (?????) Moments in History

Linked items

No linked items imported yet.