Table feel
The game Snakesss has a high level of direct confrontation and strategic depth in confrontation. Players need to frequently pay attention to and react to each other's actions. However, there is less emphasis on cooperation in this game.
Snakesss
Players
4-8
Time
?-?
Age
12+
Weight
1.13
Rating
6.38
Fit
Teach
2.9
Teaching signal
Replay
4.0
High replayability
Interaction
3.7
Highly interactive
Scaling
4.0
Scales well
Strategy
4.5
Deep strategy
Control
3.0
Luck-sensitive
Replay value
Snakesss has a high replayability score due to its high variability gameboard, expansions available, strategic depth, scalability, and moderate easiness to learn. The game offers different experiences each time it is played, with multiple paths to victory and variable setups. The presence of expansions adds new content and gameplay elements, further enhancing the replay value. The game allows players to improve their strategy over time, providing deep strategic possibilities. It adapts well to different player counts without compromising its appeal or balance. While it may take some time to learn, it is still manageable for most players.
Luck profile
Snakesss has a moderate level of luck involved in the game. Random elements such as dice rolls or card draws have a notable but not exclusive impact on the game outcome. Players have some ability to mitigate the effects of randomness through strategic decisions and planning. The game outcome is a balanced mix of luck and strategy, with neither element dominating. Overall, Snakesss provides a good balance between luck and player agency.
Overview
The group has a multiple-choice question and only two minutes to work it out. The snakes amongst you already know the right answer — and they'll stop at nothing to keep you away from it. In Snakesss, you deal out the cards and try to answer a multiple-choice question with the rest of the players. The more people who get it right, the more points you cash in — unless, of course, you get one of the snake cards. All the snakes already know the answer, so their job is a bit simpler. To score points, they have to sabotage the discussion and mislead the other players. —description from the publisher
Category
6Mechanism
3Type
1Editions
| Edition | Year | Language | Publisher / Region |
|---|---|---|---|
| No editions imported yet. | |||
Files
No files imported yet.
Commerce
Credits
Designers
1
Phil Walker-Harding
Artists
1
Ben Drummond
Publishers
1
Big Potato Games
Linked items
No linked items imported yet.